I hope this sounds good
This commit is contained in:
@@ -257,12 +257,10 @@
|
||||
),
|
||||
bibliography: bibliography("sources.bib"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
= Thesis
|
||||
|
||||
Despite claims of privacy concerns and IP infringement by corporations and manufacturers, right to repair laws are crucial to a sustainable circular economy--extending product lifespan, reducing electronic waste, and minimizing the environmental footprint of consumer goods.
|
||||
|
||||
= What is right to repair?
|
||||
In short, "right to repair" is the ability to fix the products you purchase. However, this right is debated by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and suppliers who broadly claim that allowing consumers to exercise this right freely could lead to adverse consequences. Because of the decline in the ease of repairing many electronic goods, a movement has evolved around the idea of right to repair. The principle of the movement is giving consumers the freedom to disassemble and diagnose issues to refurbish and fix all products that they own.
|
||||
In short, "right to repair" is the ability to fix the products you purchase. Because of the decline in the ease of repairing many electronic goods, a movement has evolved around the idea of right to repair. The principle of the movement is that if you own a product, you should have the ability to obtain the parts, documentation, tools, and software access needed to repair or modify the product. Right to repair as a movement is assertive of the concept "that ownership should be absolute"--that buying means buying the freedom to maintain it and restore it without relying exclusively on the manufacturer @repair-org.
|
||||
|
||||
= Why is right to repair important?
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -274,6 +272,7 @@ In short, "right to repair" is the ability to fix the products you purchase. How
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
= How are manufacturers fighting back?
|
||||
Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and suppliers who broadly claim that allowing consumers to exercise this right freely could lead to adverse consequences.
|
||||
@whos-right-is-it
|
||||
== Ethical Issues
|
||||
This section will focus on the ethical issues surrounding IP infringement, and how replicability may parasitize manufacturer profits. @11021197
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,148 +1,164 @@
|
||||
@article{hernandez2020Empowe,
|
||||
volume = {12},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
author = {Hernandez, Ricardo J and Miranda, Constanza and Goñi, Julian},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
title = {Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
doi = {10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
publisher = {MDPI AG},
|
||||
issn = {2071-1050},
|
||||
month = {January},
|
||||
publisher = {MDPI AG},
|
||||
title = {Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’},
|
||||
issn = {2071-1050},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
journal = {Sustainability},
|
||||
author = {Hernandez, Ricardo J and Miranda, Constanza and Goñi, Julian},
|
||||
pages = {850},
|
||||
doi = {10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@misc{34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672,
|
||||
title = {The Emerging ‘Right to Repair’ legislation in the EU and the U.S.},
|
||||
doi = {https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
author = {Svensson, Sahra and Richter, Jessika Luth and Maitre-Ekern, Eléonore and Pihlajarinne, Taina and Maigret, Aline and Dalhammar, Carl},
|
||||
keywords = {{repair; right to repair; Intellectual property rights (IPR); electronics environmental impact; Ecodesign Directive; ecodesign; Circular Economy}},
|
||||
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/63585584/Svensson_et_al._Going_Green_CARE_INNOVATION_2018_PREPRINT.pdf}},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
abstract = {{The transition to a Circular Economy (CE) aims for more efficient use of resources and reconsideration of how products are designed and used, including promoting longer lifetimes through design and repair. However, several factors influence whether it is an option for the consumer to repair the product. These range from legal and market impediments to factors of cost, convenience, and consumer preference. In this paper, we examine the current state of right to repair and different stakeholder perspectives. We outline the fundamental barriers to accessing repair services for consumer electronics as well as current and proposed policies in both the EU and U.S. promoting access to repair. Following a comparison of initiatives, we conclude by discussing the need to balance stakeholder interests in defining the desired scope of Right to Repair (R2R) - distinguished from a fully open access to repair - within the context of CE goals.}},
|
||||
doi = {https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
keywords = {{repair; right to repair; Intellectual property rights (IPR); electronics environmental impact; Ecodesign Directive; ecodesign; Circular Economy}},
|
||||
language = {{eng}},
|
||||
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/63585584/Svensson_et_al._Going_Green_CARE_INNOVATION_2018_PREPRINT.pdf}},
|
||||
title = {The Emerging ‘Right to Repair’ legislation in the EU and the U.S.},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{terryn2019A_Righ,
|
||||
author = {Terryn, Evelyne},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
year = {2019},
|
||||
number = {Issue 4},
|
||||
volume = {27},
|
||||
title = {A Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law},
|
||||
issn = {0928-9801},
|
||||
publisher = {Kluwer Law International BV},
|
||||
pages = {851–873},
|
||||
doi = {10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
pages = {851–873},
|
||||
author = {Terryn, Evelyne},
|
||||
number = {Issue 4},
|
||||
publisher = {Kluwer Law International BV},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
journal = {European Review of Private Law},
|
||||
month = {August},
|
||||
title = {A Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{jin2023Right_,
|
||||
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401},
|
||||
author = {Jin, Chen and Yang, Luyi and Zhu, Cungen},
|
||||
month = {February},
|
||||
pages = {1017–1036},
|
||||
issn = {1526-5501},
|
||||
journal = {Management Science},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
volume = {69},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401},
|
||||
journal = {Management Science},
|
||||
volume = {69},
|
||||
issn = {1526-5501},
|
||||
author = {Jin, Chen and Yang, Luyi and Zhu, Cungen},
|
||||
publisher = {Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)},
|
||||
month = {February},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
pages = {1017–1036},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{criticism-right-repair-laws,
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
title = {A Criticism of ‘Right to Repair’ Laws},
|
||||
url = {https://www.cato.org/regulation/spring-2024/criticism-right-repair-laws},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.cato.org/regulation/spring-2024/criticism-right-repair-laws},
|
||||
title = {A Criticism of ‘Right to Repair’ Laws},
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{bar-right-repair-and-environment,
|
||||
url = {https://www.americanbar.org/groups/environment_energy_resources/resources/natural-resources-environment/2023-fall/right-repair-and-environment/},
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair and the Environment—Fix It or Nix It?},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
author = {Madeline June Kass},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair and the Environment—Fix It or Nix It?},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@book{whos-right-is-it,
|
||||
pages = {125-164},
|
||||
publisher = {University of Tennessee College of Law},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
volume = {25},
|
||||
author = {Alexandar Joseph Gambino},
|
||||
title = {Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law},
|
||||
publisher = {University of Tennessee College of Law},
|
||||
volume = {25},
|
||||
notes = {Gambino, Alexandar Joseph. "Right to Repair: Whose Right Is It Anyway?." Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, vol. 25, no. 1, Fall 2023, pp. 125-164. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/transac25&i=133.},
|
||||
pages = {125-164},
|
||||
title = {Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@inproceedings{11021197,
|
||||
doi = {10.1109/SIEDS65500.2025.11021197},
|
||||
pages = {139-142},
|
||||
booktitle = {2025 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)},
|
||||
author = {Brooks, Landon and Jones, Opel and Mera, Isaac and Minneweather, Lillian},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
doi = {10.1109/SIEDS65500.2025.11021197},
|
||||
keywords = {Ethics;Portable computers;Pollution;Green products;Legislation;Companies;Maintenance engineering;Electronic waste;Sustainable development;Strain;Right to repair;sustainability;restrictive repair;ethics},
|
||||
title = {Ethical Dimensions of the Right to Repair},
|
||||
booktitle = {2025 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{two-wrongs-dont-make-a-right,
|
||||
url = {https://cei.org/studies/two-wrongs-dont-make-a-right-to-repair/},
|
||||
author = {Alex Reinauer},
|
||||
title = {Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right to Repair},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
author = {Alex Reinauer},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{unintended-consequences,
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
url = {https://hbr.org/2023/01/research-the-unintended-consequences-of-right-to-repair-laws},
|
||||
title = {Research: The Unintended Consequences of Right-to-Repair Laws},
|
||||
author = {Luyi Yang, Chen Jin and Cungen Zhu},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
title = {Research: The Unintended Consequences of Right-to-Repair Laws},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{john-deere-accused,
|
||||
title = {John Deere accused of ‘excluding’ right-to-repair language in its manuals},
|
||||
url = {https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/3/24260513/john-deere-right-to-repair-elizabeth-warren-clean-air-act},
|
||||
author = {Justine Calma},
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/3/24260513/john-deere-right-to-repair-elizabeth-warren-clean-air-act},
|
||||
title = {John Deere accused of ‘excluding’ right-to-repair language in its manuals},
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
author = {Justine Calma},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{john-deere-sued,
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
title = {FTC sues Deere & Co. for monopolizing farm-equipment repair market},
|
||||
url = {https://www.apnews.com/article/deere-farm-repair-tractors-monopoly-85c18d35a1e0999decb535aa5d7c358e},
|
||||
author = {John O'connor},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.apnews.com/article/deere-farm-repair-tractors-monopoly-85c18d35a1e0999decb535aa5d7c358e},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{apple-supports,
|
||||
url = {https://www.investopedia.com/apple-surprisingly-supports-white-house-right-to-repair-law-8382562},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
author = {Diccon Hyatt},
|
||||
title = {Apple Surprisingly Supports White House "Right to Repair" Law},
|
||||
url = {https://www.investopedia.com/apple-surprisingly-supports-white-house-right-to-repair-law-8382562},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
title = {Apple Surprisingly Supports White House "Right to Repair" Law},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{judge-dismisses,
|
||||
url = {https://www.wbur.org/news/2025/02/12/massachusetts-right-to-repair-carr-law-challenges-dismissed},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
title = {Mass. judge dismisses final 'right to repair' law challenges},
|
||||
author = {Chris Lisinski},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
author = {Chris Lisinski},
|
||||
title = {Mass. judge dismisses final 'right to repair' law challenges},
|
||||
url = {https://www.wbur.org/news/2025/02/12/massachusetts-right-to-repair-carr-law-challenges-dismissed},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{economic-downsides,
|
||||
url = {https://documents.nam.org/COMM/NAM-3740-Right%20to%20Repair%20Paper%20R4%20V1%20FIN.pdf},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon and Kerri Seyfert},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
title = {The Economic Downsides of “Right-to-Repair”},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon and Kerri Seyfert},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://documents.nam.org/COMM/NAM-3740-Right%20to%20Repair%20Paper%20R4%20V1%20FIN.pdf},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{what-is-right-to-repair,
|
||||
title = {What is Right to Repair? An introduction for curious people.},
|
||||
author = {Louis Rossman},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npd_xDuNi9k},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{repair-org,
|
||||
title = {We Need Right To Repair},
|
||||
author = {repair.org},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url {https://www.repair.org/},
|
||||
}
|
||||
148
drafting/sources.bib~
Normal file
148
drafting/sources.bib~
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
|
||||
@article{hernandez2020Empowe,
|
||||
volume = {12},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
author = {Hernandez, Ricardo J and Miranda, Constanza and Goñi, Julian},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
title = {Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
doi = {10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
publisher = {MDPI AG},
|
||||
issn = {2071-1050},
|
||||
month = {January},
|
||||
journal = {Sustainability},
|
||||
pages = {850},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@misc{34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672,
|
||||
title = {The Emerging ‘Right to Repair’ legislation in the EU and the U.S.},
|
||||
doi = {https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
author = {Svensson, Sahra and Richter, Jessika Luth and Maitre-Ekern, Eléonore and Pihlajarinne, Taina and Maigret, Aline and Dalhammar, Carl},
|
||||
keywords = {{repair; right to repair; Intellectual property rights (IPR); electronics environmental impact; Ecodesign Directive; ecodesign; Circular Economy}},
|
||||
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/63585584/Svensson_et_al._Going_Green_CARE_INNOVATION_2018_PREPRINT.pdf}},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
abstract = {{The transition to a Circular Economy (CE) aims for more efficient use of resources and reconsideration of how products are designed and used, including promoting longer lifetimes through design and repair. However, several factors influence whether it is an option for the consumer to repair the product. These range from legal and market impediments to factors of cost, convenience, and consumer preference. In this paper, we examine the current state of right to repair and different stakeholder perspectives. We outline the fundamental barriers to accessing repair services for consumer electronics as well as current and proposed policies in both the EU and U.S. promoting access to repair. Following a comparison of initiatives, we conclude by discussing the need to balance stakeholder interests in defining the desired scope of Right to Repair (R2R) - distinguished from a fully open access to repair - within the context of CE goals.}},
|
||||
language = {{eng}},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{terryn2019A_Righ,
|
||||
author = {Terryn, Evelyne},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
year = {2019},
|
||||
number = {Issue 4},
|
||||
volume = {27},
|
||||
issn = {0928-9801},
|
||||
publisher = {Kluwer Law International BV},
|
||||
pages = {851–873},
|
||||
doi = {10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
journal = {European Review of Private Law},
|
||||
month = {August},
|
||||
title = {A Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{jin2023Right_,
|
||||
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401},
|
||||
author = {Jin, Chen and Yang, Luyi and Zhu, Cungen},
|
||||
month = {February},
|
||||
pages = {1017–1036},
|
||||
issn = {1526-5501},
|
||||
journal = {Management Science},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
volume = {69},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401},
|
||||
publisher = {Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{criticism-right-repair-laws,
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
title = {A Criticism of ‘Right to Repair’ Laws},
|
||||
url = {https://www.cato.org/regulation/spring-2024/criticism-right-repair-laws},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{bar-right-repair-and-environment,
|
||||
url = {https://www.americanbar.org/groups/environment_energy_resources/resources/natural-resources-environment/2023-fall/right-repair-and-environment/},
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair and the Environment—Fix It or Nix It?},
|
||||
author = {Madeline June Kass},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@book{whos-right-is-it,
|
||||
pages = {125-164},
|
||||
publisher = {University of Tennessee College of Law},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
volume = {25},
|
||||
author = {Alexandar Joseph Gambino},
|
||||
title = {Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law},
|
||||
notes = {Gambino, Alexandar Joseph. "Right to Repair: Whose Right Is It Anyway?." Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, vol. 25, no. 1, Fall 2023, pp. 125-164. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/transac25&i=133.},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@inproceedings{11021197,
|
||||
doi = {10.1109/SIEDS65500.2025.11021197},
|
||||
pages = {139-142},
|
||||
author = {Brooks, Landon and Jones, Opel and Mera, Isaac and Minneweather, Lillian},
|
||||
keywords = {Ethics;Portable computers;Pollution;Green products;Legislation;Companies;Maintenance engineering;Electronic waste;Sustainable development;Strain;Right to repair;sustainability;restrictive repair;ethics},
|
||||
title = {Ethical Dimensions of the Right to Repair},
|
||||
booktitle = {2025 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{two-wrongs-dont-make-a-right,
|
||||
url = {https://cei.org/studies/two-wrongs-dont-make-a-right-to-repair/},
|
||||
author = {Alex Reinauer},
|
||||
title = {Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right to Repair},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{unintended-consequences,
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
url = {https://hbr.org/2023/01/research-the-unintended-consequences-of-right-to-repair-laws},
|
||||
title = {Research: The Unintended Consequences of Right-to-Repair Laws},
|
||||
author = {Luyi Yang, Chen Jin and Cungen Zhu},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{john-deere-accused,
|
||||
title = {John Deere accused of ‘excluding’ right-to-repair language in its manuals},
|
||||
url = {https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/3/24260513/john-deere-right-to-repair-elizabeth-warren-clean-air-act},
|
||||
author = {Justine Calma},
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{john-deere-sued,
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
title = {FTC sues Deere & Co. for monopolizing farm-equipment repair market},
|
||||
url = {https://www.apnews.com/article/deere-farm-repair-tractors-monopoly-85c18d35a1e0999decb535aa5d7c358e},
|
||||
author = {John O'connor},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{apple-supports,
|
||||
url = {https://www.investopedia.com/apple-surprisingly-supports-white-house-right-to-repair-law-8382562},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
author = {Diccon Hyatt},
|
||||
title = {Apple Surprisingly Supports White House "Right to Repair" Law},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{judge-dismisses,
|
||||
url = {https://www.wbur.org/news/2025/02/12/massachusetts-right-to-repair-carr-law-challenges-dismissed},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
title = {Mass. judge dismisses final 'right to repair' law challenges},
|
||||
author = {Chris Lisinski},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{economic-downsides,
|
||||
url = {https://documents.nam.org/COMM/NAM-3740-Right%20to%20Repair%20Paper%20R4%20V1%20FIN.pdf},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
title = {The Economic Downsides of “Right-to-Repair”},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon and Kerri Seyfert},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user