Got another paragraph done.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -260,9 +260,9 @@
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
= What is right to repair?
|
||||
In short, "right to repair" is the ability to fix the products you purchase. Because of the decline in the ease of repairing many electronic goods, a movement has evolved around the idea of right to repair. The principle of the movement is that if you own a product, you should have the ability to obtain the parts, documentation, tools, and software access needed to repair or modify the product. Right to repair as a movement is assertive of the concept "that ownership should be absolute"--that buying means buying the freedom to maintain it and restore it without relying exclusively on the manufacturer @repair-org. A meaningful piece of right to repair legislation should include several consumer-rights guarantees: access to fairly priced replacement parts; access to service manuals, or at the minimum, schematics; access to diagnostic or specialty tools; and the ability to unlock any software restrictions @what-is-right-to-repair.
|
||||
The principle of right to repair is that if you own a product, you should have the ability to obtain the parts, documentation, tools, and software access needed to repair or modify the product. Right to repair as a movement is assertive of the concept "that ownership should be absolute"--that buying means buying the freedom to maintain it and restore it without relying exclusively on the manufacturer @repair-org. A meaningful piece of right to repair legislation should include several consumer-rights guarantees: access to fairly priced replacement parts; access to service manuals, or at the minimum, schematics; access to diagnostic or specialty tools; and the ability to unlock any software restrictions @what-is-right-to-repair.
|
||||
|
||||
Decades ago, most consumer goods--such as cars and radios--were designed to be opened and serviced by anyone with basic mechanical skills, a lot of the time, there were even service manuals and schematics printed inside the products or supplied with them. @what-is-right-to-repair. Recently however, there has a been a significant shift in the culture surrounding repair. As electronics advanced, becoming physically smaller, they became increasingly dependant on software, and these devices began being sealed shut, and their technical information was withheld from end users. This shift towards disposable, products gave rise to the modern right-to-repair movement.
|
||||
Decades ago, most consumer goods--such as cars and radios--were designed to be opened and serviced by anyone with basic mechanical skills, a lot of the time, there were even service manuals and schematics printed inside the products or supplied with them. @what-is-right-to-repair. Louis Rossman, founder of Rossman Repair Group Inc. notes in a 2020 video introducing the right to repair that personal computers "came with thick books of schematics," however, as of 2016, "repair centers cannot get access to schematics and diagrams". There significant shift in the culture surrounding repair. As electronics advanced and became physically smaller, these practices expanded beyond personal computers; household devices became increasingly dependant on software, began being sealed shut, and their technical information gate-kept from end users. Disposable products became the norm, and with repair being hindered heavily, the modern right to repair movement was born. A major turning point came in 2012, when massachusets passed the nations first automotive repair laws @2012-mass-laws. Fisher from Landline.Media, a news outlet reporting on the trucking industry, reports that these laws required tools made available to the auto dealers also be made available for purchase to both owners and independent repair shops.
|
||||
|
||||
= Why is right to repair important?
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ Decades ago, most consumer goods--such as cars and radios--were designed to be o
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
= How are manufacturers fighting back?
|
||||
Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and suppliers who broadly claim that allowing consumers to exercise this right freely could lead to adverse consequences.
|
||||
@whos-right-is-it
|
||||
Manufacturers increasingly employ design and business practices that make independent repair difficult or even impossible. Common tactics include the use of proprietary screws, excessive adhesive, soldering typically modular components onto boards, and physically welding housings together, blocking internal access @repair-org. These obstacles make simple maintenance impractical. Another barrier is the introduction of digital locks, many companies--such as Apple--require "part-pairing" on all hardware used in their devices. Without reprogramming of replacement parts by an authorized servicer, pervasive errors may appear on screen, and the replacement parts could even be completely rejected by the motherboard.
|
||||
|
||||
== Ethical Issues
|
||||
This section will focus on the ethical issues surrounding IP infringement, and how replicability may parasitize manufacturer profits. @11021197
|
||||
== OEMs' arguments
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,64 +1,64 @@
|
||||
@article{hernandez2020Empowe,
|
||||
volume = {12},
|
||||
issn = {2071-1050},
|
||||
month = {January},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
publisher = {MDPI AG},
|
||||
title = {Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’},
|
||||
issn = {2071-1050},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
journal = {Sustainability},
|
||||
author = {Hernandez, Ricardo J and Miranda, Constanza and Goñi, Julian},
|
||||
pages = {850},
|
||||
doi = {10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
volume = {12},
|
||||
journal = {Sustainability},
|
||||
pages = {850},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@misc{34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672,
|
||||
doi = {https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672},
|
||||
author = {Svensson, Sahra and Richter, Jessika Luth and Maitre-Ekern, Eléonore and Pihlajarinne, Taina and Maigret, Aline and Dalhammar, Carl},
|
||||
abstract = {{The transition to a Circular Economy (CE) aims for more efficient use of resources and reconsideration of how products are designed and used, including promoting longer lifetimes through design and repair. However, several factors influence whether it is an option for the consumer to repair the product. These range from legal and market impediments to factors of cost, convenience, and consumer preference. In this paper, we examine the current state of right to repair and different stakeholder perspectives. We outline the fundamental barriers to accessing repair services for consumer electronics as well as current and proposed policies in both the EU and U.S. promoting access to repair. Following a comparison of initiatives, we conclude by discussing the need to balance stakeholder interests in defining the desired scope of Right to Repair (R2R) - distinguished from a fully open access to repair - within the context of CE goals.}},
|
||||
doi = {https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
keywords = {{repair; right to repair; Intellectual property rights (IPR); electronics environmental impact; Ecodesign Directive; ecodesign; Circular Economy}},
|
||||
language = {{eng}},
|
||||
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/63585584/Svensson_et_al._Going_Green_CARE_INNOVATION_2018_PREPRINT.pdf}},
|
||||
title = {The Emerging ‘Right to Repair’ legislation in the EU and the U.S.},
|
||||
keywords = {{repair; right to repair; Intellectual property rights (IPR); electronics environmental impact; Ecodesign Directive; ecodesign; Circular Economy}},
|
||||
language = {{eng}},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{terryn2019A_Righ,
|
||||
doi = {10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
publisher = {Kluwer Law International BV},
|
||||
author = {Terryn, Evelyne},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
issn = {0928-9801},
|
||||
pages = {851–873},
|
||||
journal = {European Review of Private Law},
|
||||
year = {2019},
|
||||
volume = {27},
|
||||
title = {A Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law},
|
||||
issn = {0928-9801},
|
||||
doi = {10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
pages = {851–873},
|
||||
author = {Terryn, Evelyne},
|
||||
number = {Issue 4},
|
||||
publisher = {Kluwer Law International BV},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
journal = {European Review of Private Law},
|
||||
month = {August},
|
||||
title = {A Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{jin2023Right_,
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401},
|
||||
journal = {Management Science},
|
||||
volume = {69},
|
||||
issn = {1526-5501},
|
||||
author = {Jin, Chen and Yang, Luyi and Zhu, Cungen},
|
||||
publisher = {Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)},
|
||||
month = {February},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401},
|
||||
journal = {Management Science},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications},
|
||||
author = {Jin, Chen and Yang, Luyi and Zhu, Cungen},
|
||||
volume = {69},
|
||||
month = {February},
|
||||
publisher = {Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)},
|
||||
pages = {1017–1036},
|
||||
issn = {1526-5501},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{criticism-right-repair-laws,
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.cato.org/regulation/spring-2024/criticism-right-repair-laws},
|
||||
title = {A Criticism of ‘Right to Repair’ Laws},
|
||||
url = {https://www.cato.org/regulation/spring-2024/criticism-right-repair-laws},
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon},
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -66,93 +66,93 @@
|
||||
@online{bar-right-repair-and-environment,
|
||||
url = {https://www.americanbar.org/groups/environment_energy_resources/resources/natural-resources-environment/2023-fall/right-repair-and-environment/},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
author = {Madeline June Kass},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
author = {Madeline June Kass},
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair and the Environment—Fix It or Nix It?},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@book{whos-right-is-it,
|
||||
author = {Alexandar Joseph Gambino},
|
||||
publisher = {University of Tennessee College of Law},
|
||||
volume = {25},
|
||||
notes = {Gambino, Alexandar Joseph. "Right to Repair: Whose Right Is It Anyway?." Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, vol. 25, no. 1, Fall 2023, pp. 125-164. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/transac25&i=133.},
|
||||
pages = {125-164},
|
||||
publisher = {University of Tennessee College of Law},
|
||||
title = {Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law},
|
||||
pages = {125-164},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
notes = {Gambino, Alexandar Joseph. "Right to Repair: Whose Right Is It Anyway?." Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, vol. 25, no. 1, Fall 2023, pp. 125-164. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/transac25&i=133.},
|
||||
author = {Alexandar Joseph Gambino},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@inproceedings{11021197,
|
||||
doi = {10.1109/SIEDS65500.2025.11021197},
|
||||
pages = {139-142},
|
||||
booktitle = {2025 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)},
|
||||
author = {Brooks, Landon and Jones, Opel and Mera, Isaac and Minneweather, Lillian},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
doi = {10.1109/SIEDS65500.2025.11021197},
|
||||
keywords = {Ethics;Portable computers;Pollution;Green products;Legislation;Companies;Maintenance engineering;Electronic waste;Sustainable development;Strain;Right to repair;sustainability;restrictive repair;ethics},
|
||||
title = {Ethical Dimensions of the Right to Repair},
|
||||
booktitle = {2025 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{two-wrongs-dont-make-a-right,
|
||||
author = {Alex Reinauer},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
url = {https://cei.org/studies/two-wrongs-dont-make-a-right-to-repair/},
|
||||
title = {Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right to Repair},
|
||||
author = {Alex Reinauer},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{unintended-consequences,
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
url = {https://hbr.org/2023/01/research-the-unintended-consequences-of-right-to-repair-laws},
|
||||
author = {Luyi Yang, Chen Jin and Cungen Zhu},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
title = {Research: The Unintended Consequences of Right-to-Repair Laws},
|
||||
url = {https://hbr.org/2023/01/research-the-unintended-consequences-of-right-to-repair-laws},
|
||||
author = {Luyi Yang, Chen Jin and Cungen Zhu},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{john-deere-accused,
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/3/24260513/john-deere-right-to-repair-elizabeth-warren-clean-air-act},
|
||||
title = {John Deere accused of ‘excluding’ right-to-repair language in its manuals},
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
author = {Justine Calma},
|
||||
url = {https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/3/24260513/john-deere-right-to-repair-elizabeth-warren-clean-air-act},
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{john-deere-sued,
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
title = {FTC sues Deere & Co. for monopolizing farm-equipment repair market},
|
||||
author = {John O'connor},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.apnews.com/article/deere-farm-repair-tractors-monopoly-85c18d35a1e0999decb535aa5d7c358e},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{apple-supports,
|
||||
author = {Diccon Hyatt},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
url = {https://www.investopedia.com/apple-surprisingly-supports-white-house-right-to-repair-law-8382562},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
title = {Apple Surprisingly Supports White House "Right to Repair" Law},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{judge-dismisses,
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
author = {Chris Lisinski},
|
||||
title = {Mass. judge dismisses final 'right to repair' law challenges},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.wbur.org/news/2025/02/12/massachusetts-right-to-repair-carr-law-challenges-dismissed},
|
||||
author = {Chris Lisinski},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{economic-downsides,
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon and Kerri Seyfert},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
title = {The Economic Downsides of “Right-to-Repair”},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon and Kerri Seyfert},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://documents.nam.org/COMM/NAM-3740-Right%20to%20Repair%20Paper%20R4%20V1%20FIN.pdf},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{what-is-right-to-repair,
|
||||
title = {What is Right to Repair? An introduction for curious people.},
|
||||
author = {Louis Rossman},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
author = {Louis Rossman},
|
||||
title = {What is Right to Repair? An introduction for curious people.},
|
||||
url = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npd_xDuNi9k},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{repair-org,
|
||||
@@ -161,4 +161,12 @@
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.repair.org/},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{2012-mass-laws,
|
||||
author = {Tyson Fisher},
|
||||
title = {Federal court rejects challenge to Massachusetts’ stricter right-to-repair law},
|
||||
url = {https://landline.media/federal-court-rejects-challenge-to-massachusetts-stricter-right-to-repair-law/},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
journal = {},
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,148 +1,164 @@
|
||||
@article{hernandez2020Empowe,
|
||||
volume = {12},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
author = {Hernandez, Ricardo J and Miranda, Constanza and Goñi, Julian},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
title = {Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
doi = {10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
publisher = {MDPI AG},
|
||||
issn = {2071-1050},
|
||||
month = {January},
|
||||
publisher = {MDPI AG},
|
||||
title = {Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’},
|
||||
issn = {2071-1050},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
journal = {Sustainability},
|
||||
author = {Hernandez, Ricardo J and Miranda, Constanza and Goñi, Julian},
|
||||
pages = {850},
|
||||
doi = {10.3390/su12030850},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@misc{34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672,
|
||||
title = {The Emerging ‘Right to Repair’ legislation in the EU and the U.S.},
|
||||
doi = {https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
author = {Svensson, Sahra and Richter, Jessika Luth and Maitre-Ekern, Eléonore and Pihlajarinne, Taina and Maigret, Aline and Dalhammar, Carl},
|
||||
keywords = {{repair; right to repair; Intellectual property rights (IPR); electronics environmental impact; Ecodesign Directive; ecodesign; Circular Economy}},
|
||||
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/63585584/Svensson_et_al._Going_Green_CARE_INNOVATION_2018_PREPRINT.pdf}},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
abstract = {{The transition to a Circular Economy (CE) aims for more efficient use of resources and reconsideration of how products are designed and used, including promoting longer lifetimes through design and repair. However, several factors influence whether it is an option for the consumer to repair the product. These range from legal and market impediments to factors of cost, convenience, and consumer preference. In this paper, we examine the current state of right to repair and different stakeholder perspectives. We outline the fundamental barriers to accessing repair services for consumer electronics as well as current and proposed policies in both the EU and U.S. promoting access to repair. Following a comparison of initiatives, we conclude by discussing the need to balance stakeholder interests in defining the desired scope of Right to Repair (R2R) - distinguished from a fully open access to repair - within the context of CE goals.}},
|
||||
doi = {https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
keywords = {{repair; right to repair; Intellectual property rights (IPR); electronics environmental impact; Ecodesign Directive; ecodesign; Circular Economy}},
|
||||
language = {{eng}},
|
||||
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/63585584/Svensson_et_al._Going_Green_CARE_INNOVATION_2018_PREPRINT.pdf}},
|
||||
title = {The Emerging ‘Right to Repair’ legislation in the EU and the U.S.},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{terryn2019A_Righ,
|
||||
author = {Terryn, Evelyne},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
year = {2019},
|
||||
number = {Issue 4},
|
||||
volume = {27},
|
||||
title = {A Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law},
|
||||
issn = {0928-9801},
|
||||
publisher = {Kluwer Law International BV},
|
||||
pages = {851–873},
|
||||
doi = {10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
pages = {851–873},
|
||||
author = {Terryn, Evelyne},
|
||||
number = {Issue 4},
|
||||
publisher = {Kluwer Law International BV},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2019044},
|
||||
journal = {European Review of Private Law},
|
||||
month = {August},
|
||||
title = {A Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{jin2023Right_,
|
||||
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401},
|
||||
author = {Jin, Chen and Yang, Luyi and Zhu, Cungen},
|
||||
month = {February},
|
||||
pages = {1017–1036},
|
||||
issn = {1526-5501},
|
||||
journal = {Management Science},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
volume = {69},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401},
|
||||
journal = {Management Science},
|
||||
volume = {69},
|
||||
issn = {1526-5501},
|
||||
author = {Jin, Chen and Yang, Luyi and Zhu, Cungen},
|
||||
publisher = {Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)},
|
||||
month = {February},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
doi = {10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
pages = {1017–1036},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{criticism-right-repair-laws,
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
title = {A Criticism of ‘Right to Repair’ Laws},
|
||||
url = {https://www.cato.org/regulation/spring-2024/criticism-right-repair-laws},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.cato.org/regulation/spring-2024/criticism-right-repair-laws},
|
||||
title = {A Criticism of ‘Right to Repair’ Laws},
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{bar-right-repair-and-environment,
|
||||
url = {https://www.americanbar.org/groups/environment_energy_resources/resources/natural-resources-environment/2023-fall/right-repair-and-environment/},
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair and the Environment—Fix It or Nix It?},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
author = {Madeline June Kass},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
title = {Right to Repair and the Environment—Fix It or Nix It?},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@book{whos-right-is-it,
|
||||
pages = {125-164},
|
||||
publisher = {University of Tennessee College of Law},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
volume = {25},
|
||||
author = {Alexandar Joseph Gambino},
|
||||
title = {Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law},
|
||||
publisher = {University of Tennessee College of Law},
|
||||
volume = {25},
|
||||
notes = {Gambino, Alexandar Joseph. "Right to Repair: Whose Right Is It Anyway?." Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law, vol. 25, no. 1, Fall 2023, pp. 125-164. HeinOnline, https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/transac25&i=133.},
|
||||
pages = {125-164},
|
||||
title = {Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@inproceedings{11021197,
|
||||
doi = {10.1109/SIEDS65500.2025.11021197},
|
||||
pages = {139-142},
|
||||
booktitle = {2025 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)},
|
||||
author = {Brooks, Landon and Jones, Opel and Mera, Isaac and Minneweather, Lillian},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
doi = {10.1109/SIEDS65500.2025.11021197},
|
||||
keywords = {Ethics;Portable computers;Pollution;Green products;Legislation;Companies;Maintenance engineering;Electronic waste;Sustainable development;Strain;Right to repair;sustainability;restrictive repair;ethics},
|
||||
title = {Ethical Dimensions of the Right to Repair},
|
||||
booktitle = {2025 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{two-wrongs-dont-make-a-right,
|
||||
url = {https://cei.org/studies/two-wrongs-dont-make-a-right-to-repair/},
|
||||
author = {Alex Reinauer},
|
||||
title = {Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right to Repair},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
author = {Alex Reinauer},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{unintended-consequences,
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
url = {https://hbr.org/2023/01/research-the-unintended-consequences-of-right-to-repair-laws},
|
||||
title = {Research: The Unintended Consequences of Right-to-Repair Laws},
|
||||
author = {Luyi Yang, Chen Jin and Cungen Zhu},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
title = {Research: The Unintended Consequences of Right-to-Repair Laws},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{john-deere-accused,
|
||||
title = {John Deere accused of ‘excluding’ right-to-repair language in its manuals},
|
||||
url = {https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/3/24260513/john-deere-right-to-repair-elizabeth-warren-clean-air-act},
|
||||
author = {Justine Calma},
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/3/24260513/john-deere-right-to-repair-elizabeth-warren-clean-air-act},
|
||||
title = {John Deere accused of ‘excluding’ right-to-repair language in its manuals},
|
||||
year = {2024},
|
||||
author = {Justine Calma},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{john-deere-sued,
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
title = {FTC sues Deere & Co. for monopolizing farm-equipment repair market},
|
||||
url = {https://www.apnews.com/article/deere-farm-repair-tractors-monopoly-85c18d35a1e0999decb535aa5d7c358e},
|
||||
author = {John O'connor},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.apnews.com/article/deere-farm-repair-tractors-monopoly-85c18d35a1e0999decb535aa5d7c358e},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{apple-supports,
|
||||
url = {https://www.investopedia.com/apple-surprisingly-supports-white-house-right-to-repair-law-8382562},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
author = {Diccon Hyatt},
|
||||
title = {Apple Surprisingly Supports White House "Right to Repair" Law},
|
||||
url = {https://www.investopedia.com/apple-surprisingly-supports-white-house-right-to-repair-law-8382562},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
title = {Apple Surprisingly Supports White House "Right to Repair" Law},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{judge-dismisses,
|
||||
url = {https://www.wbur.org/news/2025/02/12/massachusetts-right-to-repair-carr-law-challenges-dismissed},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
title = {Mass. judge dismisses final 'right to repair' law challenges},
|
||||
author = {Chris Lisinski},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
author = {Chris Lisinski},
|
||||
title = {Mass. judge dismisses final 'right to repair' law challenges},
|
||||
url = {https://www.wbur.org/news/2025/02/12/massachusetts-right-to-repair-carr-law-challenges-dismissed},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{economic-downsides,
|
||||
url = {https://documents.nam.org/COMM/NAM-3740-Right%20to%20Repair%20Paper%20R4%20V1%20FIN.pdf},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon and Kerri Seyfert},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
title = {The Economic Downsides of “Right-to-Repair”},
|
||||
author = {Ike Brannon and Kerri Seyfert},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://documents.nam.org/COMM/NAM-3740-Right%20to%20Repair%20Paper%20R4%20V1%20FIN.pdf},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{what-is-right-to-repair,
|
||||
title = {What is Right to Repair? An introduction for curious people.},
|
||||
author = {Louis Rossman},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npd_xDuNi9k},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@online{repair-org,
|
||||
title = {We Need Right To Repair},
|
||||
author = {repair.org},
|
||||
year = {2025},
|
||||
note = {Accessed 16 Oct. 2025},
|
||||
url = {https://www.repair.org/},
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user