Added sources section
This commit is contained in:
12
outline.typ
12
outline.typ
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
||||
#show: ieee.with(
|
||||
title: [How anti-repair practices are contributing to an excess in waste],
|
||||
abstract: [
|
||||
Right-to-repair legislation is challenged by OEMs and larger firms, claiming concerns for end-user data privacy, IP infringement, and degrading of products with cheaper replacement parts. They use these claims to perpetrate practices of locking down software crucial for diagnosing technical issues, building products to be difficult to disassemble, and voiding warranty if they are opened. These practices reduce the incentive for a consumer to continue using a product after it fails, even if the issue is a minor fix, such as replacing the screen or battery. These often still functional electronic products are treated as disposables, instead of a tool which is able to be serviced back to its original function.
|
||||
Right-to-repair legislation is challenged by OEMs and larger firms, claiming concerns for end-user data privacy, IP infringement, and degrading of products with cheaper replacement parts. They use these claims to perpetrate practices of locking down software crucial for diagnosing technical issues, building products to be difficult to disassemble, and voiding warranty if they are opened. These practices reduce the incentive for a consumer to continue using a product after it fails, even if the issue is a minor fix, such as replacing the screen or battery. These often still functional electronic products are treated as disposables, instead of a tool which is able to be serviced back to its original function. Supporting right to repair is crucial to allowing the extension of product lifespan, which will reduce electronic waste, and minimize the environmental footprint of consumer goods.
|
||||
],
|
||||
authors: (
|
||||
(
|
||||
@@ -17,4 +17,12 @@
|
||||
bibliography: bibliography("sources.bib"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
= Intro
|
||||
= Thesis
|
||||
|
||||
Despite claims of privacy concerns and IP infringement by corporations and manufacturers, right to repair laws are crucial to a sustainable circular economy--extending product lifespan, reducing electronic waste, and minimizing the environmental footprint of consumer goods.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
= So that all my sources are displayed, I will reference them in-text here.
|
||||
As I pick which paragraphs I want to use each source, I will remove them from this block, and put them where they need to be in the paragraph. @34ca32eb-5148-4b33-b82a-d7cfca46c672 @apple-supports @bar-right-repair-and-environment @economic-downsides @criticism-right-repair-laws @two-wrongs-dont-make-a-right @unintended-consequences @whos-right-is-it @terryn2019A_Righ @hernandez2020Empowe @jin2023Right_ @11021197 @john-deere-accused @john-deere-sued
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user